lst.ink

← All comparisons

Bedrock vs ether.fi

How Bedrock and ether.fi differ on token, backend, TVL and approach.

Bedrockether.fi
TypeUniversal LRTEigenLayer LRT
LRT tokenuniETH / uniBTCeETH / weETH
How it worksBedrock’s "uni" standard issues uniETH, uniBTC and uniIOTX — liquid restaked tokens that unlock liquidity for multiple PoS assets, not just ETH, bridging ETH and Bitcoin restaking.Stake ETH (or an LST) for eETH, restaked via EigenLayer (and beyond) to earn staking + AVS rewards; weETH is the wrapped, DeFi-friendly version. Uniquely, users keep control of their withdrawal keys. Also runs the ether.fi Cash card.
Restakes onEigenLayer + BabylonEigenLayer (+ Symbiotic)
TVL*~$37M~$6B+
Best forMulti-asset (ETH + BTC) restakingThe safe default — liquidity & integrations

Bedrock

  • Multi-asset (ETH, BTC, IOTX)
  • Bridges ETH + BTC restaking
  • Universal standard
  • Smaller TVL
  • Liquidity spread across assets

ether.fi

  • Largest LRT by far (~65% share)
  • Deepest DeFi liquidity & integrations
  • Non-custodial withdrawal keys
  • Yield not always the highest
  • Systemic weight / concentration

Bottom line

Pick Bedrock for multi-asset (eth + btc) restaking; pick ether.fi for the safe default — liquidity & integrations.

* TVL = dated snapshot (DefiLlama + provider reports, 2026).