lst.ink

Kelp DAO vs Renzo

How Kelp DAO and Renzo differ on token, backend, TVL and approach.

Kelp DAORenzo
TypeMulti-LST LRTMultichain LRT
LRT tokenrsETHezETH
How it worksDeposit supported LSTs (stETH, ETHx, sfrxETH) or ETH to mint rsETH, restaked via EigenLayer. Kelp pioneered points-stacking early in the restaking boom.Deposit ETH/LSTs for ezETH; Renzo actively manages the restaking strategy and AVS selection. ezETH is pushed to Arbitrum, Blast, Linea, Mode and more, so you can use restaked exposure across L2s.
Restakes onEigenLayerEigenLayer + Symbiotic
TVL*~$1B (post-exploit)~$1B+
Best forExisting LST holdersRestaked exposure across L2s

Kelp DAO

  • Accepts multiple LSTs (stETH/ETHx/sfrxETH)
  • Simple deposit → rsETH
  • Broad availability & integrations
  • April 2026 LayerZero-adapter exploit (~$290M, ~18% of supply)
  • Triggered sector-wide withdrawals — trust hit

Renzo

  • Most aggressive multichain (Arbitrum, Blast, Linea, Mode)
  • Managed restaking strategy + AVS selection
  • Best for L2 DeFi
  • ezETH has had a depeg episode
  • Managed = trust in operator choices

Bottom line

Pick Kelp DAO for existing lst holders; pick Renzo for restaked exposure across l2s.

* TVL = dated snapshot (DefiLlama + provider reports, 2026).