lst.ink

Puffer vs Kelp DAO

How Puffer and Kelp DAO differ on token, backend, TVL and approach.

PufferKelp DAO
TypeAnti-slashing LRTMulti-LST LRT
LRT tokenpufETHrsETH
How it worksNative liquid restaking: pufETH is yield-bearing (mirrors wstETH) with Puffer’s anti-slashing tech to cut validator penalties; it accrues Puffer + EigenLayer points. Puffer also builds a based rollup.Deposit supported LSTs (stETH, ETHx, sfrxETH) or ETH to mint rsETH, restaked via EigenLayer. Kelp pioneered points-stacking early in the restaking boom.
Restakes onEigenLayerEigenLayer
TVL*~$106M~$1B (post-exploit)
Best forSlashing-conscious restakersExisting LST holders

Puffer

  • Anti-slashing tech (reduces penalties)
  • Native restaking, not just an LST wrapper
  • Puffer + EigenLayer points
  • Smaller TVL than ether.fi/Renzo
  • Anti-slashing adds complexity

Kelp DAO

  • Accepts multiple LSTs (stETH/ETHx/sfrxETH)
  • Simple deposit → rsETH
  • Broad availability & integrations
  • April 2026 LayerZero-adapter exploit (~$290M, ~18% of supply)
  • Triggered sector-wide withdrawals — trust hit

Bottom line

Pick Puffer for slashing-conscious restakers; pick Kelp DAO for existing lst holders.

* TVL = dated snapshot (DefiLlama + provider reports, 2026).