lst.ink

Renzo vs Kelp DAO

How Renzo and Kelp DAO differ on token, backend, TVL and approach.

RenzoKelp DAO
TypeMultichain LRTMulti-LST LRT
LRT tokenezETHrsETH
How it worksDeposit ETH/LSTs for ezETH; Renzo actively manages the restaking strategy and AVS selection. ezETH is pushed to Arbitrum, Blast, Linea, Mode and more, so you can use restaked exposure across L2s.Deposit supported LSTs (stETH, ETHx, sfrxETH) or ETH to mint rsETH, restaked via EigenLayer. Kelp pioneered points-stacking early in the restaking boom.
Restakes onEigenLayer + SymbioticEigenLayer
TVL*~$1B+~$1B (post-exploit)
Best forRestaked exposure across L2sExisting LST holders

Renzo

  • Most aggressive multichain (Arbitrum, Blast, Linea, Mode)
  • Managed restaking strategy + AVS selection
  • Best for L2 DeFi
  • ezETH has had a depeg episode
  • Managed = trust in operator choices

Kelp DAO

  • Accepts multiple LSTs (stETH/ETHx/sfrxETH)
  • Simple deposit → rsETH
  • Broad availability & integrations
  • April 2026 LayerZero-adapter exploit (~$290M, ~18% of supply)
  • Triggered sector-wide withdrawals — trust hit

Bottom line

Pick Renzo for restaked exposure across l2s; pick Kelp DAO for existing lst holders.

* TVL = dated snapshot (DefiLlama + provider reports, 2026).