lst.ink

Swell vs Kelp DAO

How Swell and Kelp DAO differ on token, backend, TVL and approach.

SwellKelp DAO
TypeDual-restake LRTMulti-LST LRT
LRT tokenrswETHrsETH
How it worksSwell issues swETH (LST) and rswETH (LRT). "Proof of Restake" uses restaked assets to secure both EigenLayer AVSs and Symbiotic networks, and Swell runs its own L2 (Swellchain).Deposit supported LSTs (stETH, ETHx, sfrxETH) or ETH to mint rsETH, restaked via EigenLayer. Kelp pioneered points-stacking early in the restaking boom.
Restakes onEigenLayer + SymbioticEigenLayer
TVL*~$200M~$1B (post-exploit)
Best forDual EigenLayer + Symbiotic exposureExisting LST holders

Swell

  • Dual restaking (EigenLayer + Symbiotic)
  • Own LST (swETH) + LRT (rswETH)
  • Swellchain L2 ecosystem
  • Smaller than top LRTs
  • Dual-backend complexity

Kelp DAO

  • Accepts multiple LSTs (stETH/ETHx/sfrxETH)
  • Simple deposit → rsETH
  • Broad availability & integrations
  • April 2026 LayerZero-adapter exploit (~$290M, ~18% of supply)
  • Triggered sector-wide withdrawals — trust hit

Bottom line

Pick Swell for dual eigenlayer + symbiotic exposure; pick Kelp DAO for existing lst holders.

* TVL = dated snapshot (DefiLlama + provider reports, 2026).